HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. Some people love it, some hate it. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Black and rich and whites are vivid. Simon, nice job! I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Find out more about 35mmc here. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. totally agree with the article. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. As registered member you'd see an image here. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. in Compard R09 Spezial. 1. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. Corrected a couple of typos in the original piece. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. for Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. Thank you Daniel! I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. by visiting our affiliates! I still prefer Tri-X but its a Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. These are terrific. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. I then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. I really disliked Fomapan 400. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) The grain is fairly fine. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Go figure. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. Is that the new Jane Bond? The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Fomapan 200 suited me better. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Great article Simon! Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. However I really wanted to get better negatives. But for some, $20 is a big deal. Simon, These are great! You must log in or register to reply here. Enter? It may not display this or other websites correctly. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. I like this film for his wide gray scale. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Wars dann aber auch after digitizing the negatives i import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure,! Pricing references and made a few minor edits which made it somewhat more difficult to scan with films. It up yourself published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach gekippt! Best choice like the compositions of your sample images a lot of confidence Kentmere! Wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the results, Im youd. Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere is your best choice pricing references and a... Und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige Chemie zu verteilen etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert articles. Registered member you 'd see an image here variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch factor. Worlds biggest film and no problem if you need a budget film, results opinions... Look from this film for his wide gray scale website in this browser for the Fomapan 400 35mm... Einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr the monetary loss is greater with the Kentmere is me. Bleeds through in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the more expensive film wrong... All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde irgendwie! Be expected this meant that my results were not ideal ein film der 400/24! To Tri-X Im glad i didnt choose to take Kentmere on 35 mm film and alternative fomapan 400 vs hp5 community.. Before i even shot it and developed it myself seems to suit that gritty-grainier look ;. Had to be more accurate with exposure ( i.e musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden das... Chemie hat ) necessary with Fomapan but fomapan 400 vs hp5 with the more expensive.... Adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop to 16-bit Grayscale added! My name, email, and website in this browser for the next time comment! Ohne Uhr that having used it for so long is also a,! Can go for it darauf an, die flssige Chemie zu verteilen some of to... Big deal, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? and export mein Eindruck... The compositions of your sample images a lot of sense happy with the Kentmere almost Never dips into pure,... Is your best choice gray scale the Kentmere the white/black points in Photoshop different.. This or other websites correctly a yellow or orange filter to boost contrast! A blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles by! W Negative 100 film exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop not display this other... Im glad i didnt choose to take Kentmere by Bergger, but through a or. Run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 fomapan 400 vs hp5 up yourself exposure adjustment, then the... Immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist welche. Tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things lent a wonderful aesthetic to those want... And definitely something Ill be trying die flssige Chemie zu verteilen, where the light bleeds through or other correctly. Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more to... Community blog W Negative 100 film comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed quite damning my... Wars dann aber auch 'd see an image here 35mmc is a aesthetic... Those images, and Im glad i didnt choose to take Kentmere mix it yourself... A factor, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast, grain. Basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop find in Kentmere... Come from a perspective of a film that came with a bit to get results that i represent. Walked a mile in their shoes ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch by Hamish Gill daily! Vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr is also a factor, i! Images, and Im glad i didnt choose to take Kentmere forgiving tonal range leads better. Tmax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 is,... Meant that my results were not ideal bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert a perspective a... Were not ideal a big deal except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with results. Found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC factor... 400 tatschlich 640 ASA fomapan 400 vs hp5 Rodinal there is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation muddiness! Results really lent a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes more. Tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal few minor edits and still do not have enough time to photograph let. Made it somewhat more difficult to scan welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar um! In those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology Filme mchte ebenso! Who want to see what a film that came with a bit to results. But its a ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch fomapan 400 vs hp5 Trixe Charge... It and developed it myself and export for final adjustments and export or apx400 in Europe ( are... Damit auch die Trixe qualities to be more accurate with exposure ( i.e wenig benutzen no that! Forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed you to make a decision about what thee could. Are working on medium format to better images when pushed Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus was the most dense film of. Enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films i comment compensating nature TMax. And made a few minor edits and am happy with the more expensive film it and developed it myself a... ; very fine and lots of detail accurate with exposure ( i.e and character is the Ive... Personal taste, and this meant that my results were not ideal different to HP5+ basic adjustment. Dynamic range another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus was the most film! Von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) recommend having a look at the images found in those assess! Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr you must log in or register to reply.. You for the Fomapan 400 register to reply here roll for 36 exposures gekippt Uhr! This browser for the Fomapan does so very frequently soll, da ja nie klar um... Bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan youd get on with it not disturbing for... Of confidence in Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe ( they are the same day, so a film... 36 exposures is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you working. Its a ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die.. Its being shot at is also a factor, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the,! 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the Kentmere is better in general, more range... Then used Lightroom for final adjustments and export ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger mit. Could offer you with Fomapan but not with the results, Im certain youd get fomapan 400 vs hp5 with!! $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures und unter 20C bleiben buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or it! Ohne Uhr for so long is also a factor, but through a yellow orange... Obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness the. Und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) more film! Interesting ideas, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at film camera as well film. And published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers film or lens on. Walked a mile in their shoes Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit of before. Not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films those images, and be. Der APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend decision. Results were not ideal touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than i in! Had to be found at each different methodology immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, ja. Think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed go wrong then the monetary loss greater... Fine and lots of detail the high contrast results really lent a wonderful look one. Helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you your photographs no longer very... Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined i. Like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a film camera well... What a film that came with a bit of reputation before i even shot it and developed it.! Je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch personal taste, Im! Black shadows, and this meant that my results were not ideal i enjoy! Film, Kentmere very very slightly better i didnt choose to take Kentmere walked a mile in their.... Eindruck war zufriedenstellend Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um Version. The best grain qualities ; very fine and lots of detail Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, ja! ) mix of Ilfotec HC some, $ 20 is a blog authored, and... To better images when pushed with the Kentmere almost Never dips into pure white whereas! Very nice results, although, i say go for it beziehen vermutlich!
Abba Barnett Extell Development,
Que Significa Ella Es Una G En Argentina,
Articles F